HISTORY OF Buddhism in Burma Earlier Days

Elizabeth Moore, née Finley (29 January 1894 – 17 November 1976), was an American local historian and preservationist.

Life and work

Elizabeth Moore was born in York, South Carolinaon 29 January 1894, daughter of Congressman David E. Finleyand sister of David E. Finley, Jr., the founding chairman of the National Trust for Historic Preservation and first director of the National Gallery of Art. She studied at Winthrop College in 1910–11 before graduating from Columbia College with an A.B. degree in 1914. She married Walter Bedford Moore two years later and became a charter member of the Daughters of the American Revolution in 1926. From 1936 to 1938 she chaired the Columbia Sesquicentennial Historical Marker Committee. Moore helped select fifty sites in Columbia and Richland County for marking and wrote inscriptions and the guidebook. From 1940 to 1967 she was on the committee to save Columbia’s Hampton-Preston House. In 1952 she chaired the committee to preserve Fort Moultrie. Eight years later, Moore founded and became director of what would later be called the Historic Columbia Foundation which was successful in preserving some of the historic homes and structures in the city. She was able to obtain funds from the state to acquire and restore Rose Hill, the home of the secessionist Governor of South CarolinaWilliam Henry Gist. She died in Columbia on 17 November 1976.[1]

Notes

  1.  Scanlon & Cosner, pp. 161–62

References

  • Scanlon, Jennifer & Cosner, Shaaron (1996). American Women Historians, 1700s–1990s: A Biographical Dictionary. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-29664-2.

Categories

The Early Buddhist

Archaeology of Myanmar:

Tagaung, Thagara, and the

Mon-Pyu Dichotomy

Elizabeth Moore

Local Geographies: North, South and Peninsular1

The commonly cited 19th century AD Glass Palace Chronicle is primarily a narrative

of Anya or Upper (Ah-htet) Myanmar Buddhist places. These start with Tagaung and

then Sriksetra (Tharehkittara), leading to the rise of a complex state at Bagan

(Arimaddana). This does not mean that every element of the landscape bespoke

canonical Buddhism. Quite the contrary, for then as now, an eclectic range of

structures and objects that we today label Buddhist and Animist, shaped and

articulated man’s relationship to the lived-in world. Lower Myanmar is absent from

the chronicles’ “upper-centric” royal legitimating narrative. However, without the

ballast of the south (Auk-Myanmar) and the Tanintharyi peninsula, Upper Myanmar

sites such as Tagaung would have been far more vulnerable to political competition

between Yunnan, Tibet, and Beijing. For example, expansion of the Han dynasty (200

BC–200 AD) included incursions against the “southern barbarians,” with mention of a

Tibeto-Burman speaking people called the Pyu (P’iao or Tircul) living beyond the

1 The upper, lower and peninsula regions are defined here as: (1) areas north of about 18° N near Pyay

(Prome) in the present administrative areas of Magway, Mandalay, Sagaing Divisions and the western

edge of the Shan State plateau; (2) those from circa 16–18° N bordering the Gulf of Muttama (Martaban)

in the present day administrative areas of Ayeyarwaddy and Bago Divisions and the Mon and Karen

States; (3) the southern peninsula of Tanintharyi (Tennaserim Division) from circa 10–15° N bordering

the Andaman Sea on the west and the Thailand border on the east.2

The Early Buddhist Archaeology of Myanmar

frontier.2

From the southern provinces, links to the maritime trade routes brought other

competition and powerful new state-forming ideas. First millennium AD Buddhist

sites such as Thagara at Dawei, like Tagaung, however, have no Pyu inscriptions.

Nonetheless each has unique artifacts that highlight active trading profiles. The fruits

of maritime contributions not only distinguish the southern coast and peninsula from

the Upper Myanmar polities, they were a necessary part of the formation of the whole.

Although a north centre-south periphery operation of power generally characterizes

the early historic periods of Myanmar, the south provided an essential ecological and

territorial complement to the land wealth at the heart of the Ah-htet lineage of place in

royal chronicles.

The central point of this distinction is between the controls implicit in “centre”

versus the mutual participation of dialogue. In short, a “north” exists only if there is a

“south.” The similarity and differences, between Tagaung and Thagara underlines the

inseparability of material culture from the local ecology. As only Tagaung is included

in the country’s traditional lineage of state, their artifact parallels also highlight the

convoluted power relations implied the selections of sites (and gaps) in the chronicle

renditions of the transition from prehistoric to historic periods.

A brief summary of the author’s view of landscape alteration is given below to

support not only my comment above on the inclusion and absence of sites with similar

artifacts, but also my appeal in the end of this paper to replace the current Mon-Pyu

north-south dichotomy with a more complex lineage of place illustrated in Fig. 1.

Ecology and Buddhist Landscape Alteration

Myanmar (28° 31′ to 9° 58′ N) is twice as long north to south (2051 km) as it is east

to west (936 km), with Tagaung (23°05’N, 96°01’ E) circa 1050 km north of north of

Thagara (14°04’ N, 98°11’ E). From north to south, the mountains parallel the

Ayeyarwaddy (1130 km), Chindwin (644 km), and the Thanlwin (Salween, 241 km

south of the Shan Plateau). The Thanlwin continues south along the peninsula,

matched on the west by the Sittaung (322 km).

As with the rest of mainland Southeast Asia, seasonal wind changes bring dry and

cool weather to Myanmar from the northeast in October to April, but from May to

September, southwest winds carry eighty percent of the annual precipitation. Within

Upper Myanmar, the most dominant ecological factor is aridity. This increases as one

moves north, so that for the sites of Thagara Sriksetra, Beikthano, and Halin at

2 The meaning given to “P’iao” varied from “rebel” in early Tsin Dynasty texts to “cavalry” in later T’ang

accounts (Aung Thwin, 2005: 14).Elizabeth Moore 3

Fig. 1: Localized cultures in the first millennium AD. Tagaung and Thagara are starred in

the north and peninsular south (after Moore, 2007: 8)

approximately 16°, 18°, 20° and 22° N respectively, there is on average 5000 mm,

1250 mm, 870 mm and 750 mm rainfall per annum.

By circa 10,000–2000 BP many of the major river valleys of Myanmar appear to4

The Early Buddhist Archaeology of Myanmar

have been settled and by the undated Neolithic (circa 3500 BC?), sites have been

documented adjacent to streams (chaung), seasonal lakes (in-gyi) and ponds (in-aing).

With the appearance of bronze in the valleys of the Chindwin (circa 1500–700 BC)

and bronze-iron in the Samon (circa 700 BC–400 AD), settlements continue to be

located near water sources such as these and varied ore deposits. From the Neolithic to

Bronze-Iron eras, settlements adapted to the local ecology but there is no major terrain

modification. This changed, however, with the advent of a Buddhist elite, integrated

into or imposed upon earlier kinship groups. These new communities triggered land-

scape alteration seen in the construction of walled sites, increased resource exploit-

ation, production specialization, and widening trade networks. Thus while spaces

continued to structure societies, the imprint of man on the landscape provides a signi-

ficant record of the ritual, social and political transition from circa 200 BC to 900 AD.

Tagaung

Setting

Tagaung is a triple-walled site on the east bank of the Ayeyarwaddy that chronicles

place seven hundred years before the birth of the Buddha Gotama (circa 1300 BC).

Evidence of probable Neolithic and Bronze Age habitation has been documented from

surface finds including a range of stone tools and socketed bronze implements up to

18 cm in length from the village of Kyan Hnyat, 30 km south of Tagaung.3 The

Second Tagaung Dynasty is placed in the early Han period of expansion noted earlier

with social memory of the likely instability of these times perhaps retained in the story

of Maung Pauk Kyaing (Thado Naganaing), a commoner who becomes king after

killing a serpent (naga).4 As described below, both chronicle eras are compatible with

artifacts from the site.

3 Collection U Tin Win Oo; Kyan Hynat; Chit San Win, 2005; Moore, 2007: 127, figure.

4 A currently venerated and repaired shrine within the original habitation area enclosed by Wall 1 (19

hectares) perpetuates this tale. In the Tagaung version of this common scenario of the union of a local

chthonic spirit with an outsider, the hero is local and the chthonic spirit is from the teak and ruby mine

area of Mogok to the east of Tagaung. In 1997, an urn with bones and ash was found in front of the Naga

shrine. The round-bottom pot (22 cm high, 17.5 cm wide) contained a bronze ring (2.4 cm diameter), five

bronze bells (1 cm diameter) and eight terracotta spindle whorls (2.5 cm diameter). There were also

numerous beads, four tooth-shaped iron pieces and an iron ring (1.7 cm diameter). Other urns with similar

contents have been documented since 1997 at Hsin Hnyat and at TG31 within Wall 2 (62 hectares, called

Anya Bagan). The outer enclosing Wall 3 (204 hectares) is south of Wall 1. In the author’s view, the naga

tale may reflect Tagaung domination of Mogok area (or the reverse), with Mogok being a significant

source of not only gems, but timber, elephants and routes to China. For details on the naga shrine, the

urns and chronicle history see Brown, 1926: 111–12; Chit San Win, 2005: Win Maung (Tampwaddy): 47,

map, Pot no 3; Maung Tin and Luce, 1921: 32; Htin Aung, 1959: 87–92; Pe Maung Tin and Luce, 1960:

6.Elizabeth Moore 5

To the north and northwest of

Tagaung is copper, gold-rich river

sand and iron along the Meza and

jade mines along the Uru.5 Along

the Ayeyarwaddy, gold-washing

was common in recent years, with

silver mines to the east at Bawdwin

and Yadanatheingyi at Namtu

around Mogok, and copper and

more gold found along the edge of

the Shan Plateau.6 These resources

bolstered the trading advantages of

the walled site’s riverside location.

East of the walled area, varied eco-

zones support crops ranging from

edible oils to rice and coriander

(see Fig. 2). Winter rice or mayin

is grown on the edges of shallow

pools on the shelf between the

Ayeyarwaddy and Indaing forest

on Thaung Hwet Taung, a range

southeast of Tagaung. Pheasants,

partridge, toucans, pelicans, Saurus

cranes, and fish live around and in seasonal lakes or in-gyi and tall swamp grass areas.

Tigers, elephants, banteng (Saing), gaur, and deer were once common, with wild

elephants from the upland areas around Mogok held at Hsin Hnyat, 3.5 km south of

Tagaung, and timber at Kyan Hnyat, 30 km south of the walled zone.7 Areas east of

the walled area of Tagaung and sites to the south along the Ayeyarwaddy thus offered

ports, upland resources, and a strategic site in relation to Yunnan. This last aspect

prompted the construction of a number of Bagan-period structures, with excavations

up to 1997 yielding only Bagan-period evidence.8 However, in 1997–2006, a number

of pre-Bagan objects were unearthed at Tagaung and Hsin Nnyat, including votive

Fig. 2: Sketch map showing walled area of

Tagaung,

5 Hudson, 2004: 57, fig. 5.

6 San Win, 1997; Win Maung (Tampawaddy), personal communication, August 2006.

7 San Win, personal communication, August 2006, George, 1981: 13–14, 51.

8 Department of Archaeology excavations in 1967–1968, 1992–1993 and 1997–1999 of mounds named

TG1-21 all contained brick structures and artifacts dated to the Bagan era seemingly invalidating

chronicle histories (Moore and Nyunt Han, 2007). The few dateable Tagaung pieces like images of the

Buddha and votive tablets were consequently used in a circular argument to attribute other surface finds

to the Bagan period. Than Tun notes for instance that as excavations at Tagaung yielded evidence mostly

of the 12th century AD, that all pottery found at Tagaung dates to the same period (Than Tun, 2003: 10).6

The Early Buddhist Archaeology of Myanmar

Fig. 3: Burial urns at site TG31 (courtesy

Chit San Win)

tablets, stamped pottery, roof tiles, and

end-pieces.9 In addition to the urn

noted above within Wall 1, another

from TG 24 within Wall 2 contained

stone and terracotta beads, iron rings,

and spearheads.10 Also within Wall 2

was a rescue operation at site TG 31

that brought to light urns, stamped

pottery, finger-marked bricks, and a

range of other objects.11 The TG31

pottery, with twenty-five of the 80+

pots from the site having distinct

stamped motifs, is of particular note as

the shape and the decoration is different from pots from Pyu sites such as Beikthano

and Sriksetra.

The Tagaung pots are round-bottom bowls, urns, and water vessels. Many of the

urns are egg-shaped vessels without stamps but Vessel 11, which contained the bones

of an entire human skeleton, is baluster-shaped with three rows of 66 anthropomorphic

stamped motifs on the shoulder (see Figs. 3, 4).12 Ranging from 10 to 40 cm in height,

the Tagaung urns are similar in size to Pyu vessels, and likewise appear grouped,

possibly by lineage.13 Apart from size and clusters, however, Tagaung pottery is very

different from Sriksetra, Beikthano, and Halin examples. Nor do Tagaung pots fit

within a Pyu-urn typology of bowls, globular, betel box, and pots with high narrow

necks.14 A few Beikthano and Sriksetra urns are footed but most have rounded or flat

9 The Hsin Nynat work focused on uncovering a brick platform (SNK1), a building (SNK3) and a linear

feature (SNK2) (Chit San Win, 2004; Pandita Nanda (Tagaung) et al., 2006).

10 Moore and Nyunt Han, 2007

11 The excavations, to 1.8 meters, would thus have been circa 2.5 to 3 meters below virgin ground level.

These defined four levels, the lowest underlain by a brick ‘floor’ with finger-marked bricks (author’s

discussion with villagers, June 2008; Chit San Win, 2005: 71, 98–102; Moore, 2007).

12 Vessel 11 (38 cm high) from TG31 is stamped with a 2.5 cm diameter motif of a four-armed crowned

figure with flanking bull and elephant. The figure has prominent eyes, knees flexed, and feet touching in a

near triangle shape. Urn contents, in addition to the bones and ash, included one 1.5 cm bronze shell-like

bell, 12 terracotta “beads” (2–2.4 cm diameter), beads of quartz, carnelian, and black stones, and bronzes

such as a plain ring (2.4 cm) and another of coiled wires (5.6 cm diameter), and an iron object (8.7 cm

wide) (Chit San Win, 2005: 75).

13 Chit San Win and Win Maung (Tampawaddy) personal communiation, December 2006. Stargardt

noted clustering of urns Beikthano (KKG9 and KK11), comparing this to bronze drum burial clusters in

Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia, and likening the shape and decoration to Heger I and Karen bronze

drums. The hypotheses are worth bearing in mind given the Tagaung links to Yunnan discussed here

(Stargardt, 1994: 133; 1990).

14 Hla Tun Pru, 2003.Elizabeth Moore 7

bottoms. In contrast, there is a short flared foot on a minor but consistent percentage

of Tagaung pottery. In addition, most urns from Sriksetra and Beikthano are fluted

with flat lids and a central stem, while the Tagaung lids are rounded with knob-like

stems.15 Although Sriksetra, Halin, Beikthano, and Maingmaw urns may have

horizontal lines of geometric patterns or

bosses, only a few are stamped with a single

row of motifs such as Kalasa, Srivatsa and

Bhaddapitha.

16 Tagaung vessels have one to

three rows of round stamped motifs, 0.6 to 0.75

cm across, on the widest part of the vessel

shoulder such as a bull, stamped 20 times on

Vessel 1 from Hsin Hnyat. Motifs are encircled

by radiating lines, not the single lines of Pyu

vessels, creating a sun-like burst akin to

vessels ranging from Hastinapura’s early

centuries AD chronology to much later pottery

from Bagan.17 In short, the Tagaung motifs are

not like Beikthano and Halin, with only a few

similarities in some of the floral designs.

Although inhumation burials have been

found with urns at Halin and Beikthano, none

have yet been recorded at Tagaung. Sriksetra,

Beikthano, and Halin urns have ash, bones,

silver coins, a few gold pieces, and beads. In

contrast, Tagaung urns include grave goods of

iron, silver, gold, bronze, copper, shell, bone,

terracotta, semi-precious stone, and glass.

Some of these, such as bracelets, rings, lids,

swords, brackets, and rivets are rare or not seen

in Pyu urns.18

Fig. 4: Anthropomorphic stamp on Pot

11 (courtesy of Win Maung)

Fig. 5: Tagaung crescent roof-tile

eaves (courtesy of Chit San Win)

15 Tagaung vessels are also different from flat bottom possible urns documented by Win Maung

(Tampawaddy) at Shagwe, a fortress of Halin (Hudson, 2004: 138, 170, fig. 97; Moore, 2007).

16 Aung Thaw, 1968, figs. 41, 45, 71; Myint Aung, 2003. Four sherds with human figures have been

recorded: one dancing, another seated and three wearing crowns (Aung Thaw et al., 1993: 57, 90; Hla

Tun Pru, 2003: 85).

17 There has been little work on Bagan pottery, primarily surface finds assumed to be contemporary with

the monuments rather than earlier phases of structures. For Hastinapura motifs see Lal, 1954: Plate

XXXI, nos. 3, 7, Plate XXXII, no 16. For Bagan motifs see Than Tun, 2003: 10–11, figs. 12, 13.

18 Hla Tun Pru, 2003: 79; Hudson, 2004: 145; Moore and Nyunt Han, 2007.8

The Early Buddhist Archaeology of Myanmar

Fig. 6: Tagaung round roof-tile eaves

(courtesy Chit San Win)

In addition to the unique Tagaung urns,

crescent and round roof tile end-pieces

from Hsin Hnyat (SNK1) are distinctive

(see Figs. 5, 6).19 Similar roof tiles and

end pieces dated to the 1st to the 3rd

century A.D. have been recorded at

Trakieu and Go Cam in central Vietnam

and likened to early first millennium AD

Chinese styles of the Tsin and Han. Some

Go Cam round end-pieces bear faces,

dated to the 3rd century AD in relation to

raids against “southern barbarians,” an

outgrowth of persistent flux between Chinese and local rule in central Vietnam after

the fall of the Tsin in 206 BC.20

A final Tagaung find with no known parallels at Pyu sites is a horde of fifty small

(4-6 cm in diameter) round votive tablets recovered in 2003 (Type 2 tablet shown in

Fig. 7). The tablets were found under a deposit of Bagan period tablets 1.5 meters

below ground level. All bear a single figure of the Buddha in Bhumisparsa mudra, and

have been classified according to the surrounding motifs.21 One tablet of Type 2 was

recorded in earlier excavations and dated to the late Bagan period. With the larger

sample, scholars continue to debate their dating.22

19 Crescent-shaped end-pieces were 15 to 20 cm high, 21 to 26 cm wide and 1 to 1.5 cm thick. A central

vertical band divides the crescent, each section with a tri-lobed festoon and dotted border (Chit San Win

2004, p.165–166). Round end-pieces were 1 to 4.5 cm thick, 13 to 20 cm diameter with a rim1 to 3 cm

wide. The wide rim “frames” them in the same manner as votive tablets (Guy, 2002: 24). The round

pieces have 10 to 15 thin sun-like rays or radial lines, in some cases tipped with circular raised dots

arrayed around a central spot. While two round end-pieces have been recovered from Sriksetra, these are

closer to a lotus pattern. This is also seen in round end-pieces from Linzhang, Hebei province, dated to

the Northern Dynasty (386–589 AD) (Yang, 2004: 96d).

20 See Southworth, 2004: 214. This seemingly was also the case in western Yunnan, annexed during the

reign of the 6th Han Emperor, Wu Ti (140–86 BC). Tribute missions from Myanmar at this time brought

pearls, vitreous objects, and rare stones, although those bearing gifts may have changed during this period

as earlier groups in Yunnan dispersed towards the west and south (Taw Sein Ko, 1913: 16–17). In 225

AD, the Wei general Chu-ko-liang is said to have used bronze drums to frighten “savages” by placing

them in torrents to strike like military watch-drums at regular intervals (Hudson, 2004: 31; Kyaw Zin,

n.d.).

21 (Type 1) Oval halo, takeh or throne back and up to eight surrounding stupas; (Type 2) Filled with the

medicinal gamon, an aromatic tuber of the ginger (Kaempferia) family; (Type 3) Two small stupas and

enclosing lines, the outer marked by beindu dots (Aung Thaw et al., 1993: 187, fig. 2a, 205; Moore, 2007:

192, figure; Mya, 1960a: 50, pl. 67; Pandita Nanda (Tagaung), 2006).

22 Based on the crossed Vajrasana leg position with both feet facing upwards, some prefer an “early

Bagan” or “late Pyu” label. Others note the difficulty of identifying asana given the small size and

erosion to the tablets, so focus on the closeness of the feet to the torso, the rounded abdomen and absence

of a triangular face that suggest 4th to 5th century AD Gupta rather than 11th to 12th century AD BaganElizabeth Moore 9

Fig. 7: Tagaung votive tablets, Tagaung Museum

In fact, there is not a great stylistic distinction between the debated “early Bagan”

versus “late Pyu” labeling for the votive tablets. With style put in to rigid Pyu, Mon,

and Bagan ethno-linguistic and political categories, however, the individuality of

different sites is often lost. This issue is raised again in the following description of

Thagara located more than a thousand kilometers south of Tagaung.

Thagara

Despite legends of a visit by the Buddha to 432 BC, Dawei chronicles put the

founding of Thagara a thousand years later, in the middle of the eighth century AD

(116 ME). Dawei chronicles include the sage Gawinanda, a tale of a prince Maung

Nwa (Mr. Bull) who becomes a Yatheit. He eventually fathers two children, born of a

Ngakoma fish nat. The children, Shin Zaw and Shin Zan, enshrine Sacred Hairs

(Hsandaw) at Thagara and Shin Dhat-weh, and Shin Zan is crowned king of

Thagara.23 The Gawinanda legend clearly draws on a variety of sources, but as with

the naga tale cited earlier for Tagung, may carry memory of the transition from

ancestral to Buddhist culture during the first millennium AD.

Setting

Thagara is an oval-shaped walled site located 11.6 km north of Dawei, at the same

latitude as Bangkok. The site had river access on the east via a stream, the Padat

Chaung, on the south of the walled site and sea access via a mountain pass to Nabulei

or Pala influences. (Win Maung (Tampawaddy), personal communication, 23 December 2006).

23 Moore and Than Swe, 2006; Than Swe, 1996: 5310

The Early Buddhist Archaeology of Myanmar

Chaung, some 20 km west. 24

There are up to four walls at

Thagara: two outer rounded ones

(1600 x 1100m) enclosing the

mound and two inner

quadrangular walls (745 x

640m).25 There has been only

one preliminary survey and

excavation of the site by the

Department of Archaeology in

2001.26 The Kayat Pyin cult-

ivation area on the east of

Thagara has yielded a number of

artifacts, including beads, glazed

pots, and bronzes. The southeast

wall has a short snout-like

extension, capped with a 150m

long angular earth and brick construction (see Fig. 8). Water ponding in the dry season

indicates that this was once the course of the Padat Chaung providing porterage to the

Dawei River.

Artifacts

The beads, pottery and sculpture of Thagara illustrate the site’s local production

and trade networks. Beads include finished and unfinished pieces, round and oval

spheres, tubes, biconical shapes, and flat ovals circa 2mm to 2.3 cm. They are made of

green and blue glass, carnelian, and other semi-precious stones. The tubular beads are

opaque with a dull surface, deep red or terracotta, yellow brown, milk white, cream,

sky blue, and dark blue in color.27

Fig. 8: Thagara walled site (Google Earth)

24 Traditional accounts state that the “original” Dawei peoples lived thousands of years ago at the egress

of this stream. The word “Dawei” refers to the city, the region, and the local dialect, a highly intonated

variant of Tibeto-Burman of unknown antiquity. Words found in Bagan inscriptions account for ten per

cent of the vocabulary, with sixty-five per cent being independent Dawei (Aye Sandi, 1999).

25 Moore and Aung Myint, 1991, map 11; Survey 09.05, 04.06.

26 Two brick structures were unearthed, both with underlying levels not yet excavated: SGR1 (8 x 6.4m)

oriented to the northeast and SGR2, a (10m) rectangular building with an entry on the east, front hall and

four small cells in a row at the back (Moore, 2007: 221, figure). The structure, due to the small size of the

bricks and the layout has been attributed to the late sixteenth-century AD and has been rebuilt repeatedly,

indicated by a different alignment of the entry hall, the presence of finger-marked bricks and two

habitation layers in the 3.5m stratigraphy.

27 Moore, 2007: 223, figures.Elizabeth Moore 11

In rice fields southeast of the walled site

is the Myo Ko Kon cemetery where

numerous terracotta urns have been

unearthed at about 8-10 cm below surface

level.28 The pots are (15-50 cm in diameter

and 11 cm in height) with the elongated

neck circa 4 cm, marked with horizontal

bands. Some of the urns are incised on the

shoulder with twelve down-turned fig-leaf

motifs similar to pots found at Twante

(Khabin).29 The rounded bottom, long

neck, and vertical designs resemble sun-

dried and low-fired pots made today in the

Ohlo-byin quarter of Dawei used in the

April water festival. The pots, found in

groups of three within a bed of black soil or

ash, contain small beads, ash, and bones.

Unlike Pyu urns from Upper Myanmar

sites with many beads and silver coins, the

Thagara urns have only one to five small

blue, deep violet or red glass beads, 1mm

thick and 2mm in diameter.30

While the terracotta urns described

above point to local production, glazed pots

underline the peninsula’s long trading

history with Thailand, including a line of

six Tak princes who ruled Dawei during

the 10th century AD. One glazed vessel,

possibly linked to Tak production of a

somewhat later period, is a globular flat-

bottomed vessel made of red clay, with a

pale greenish yellow glaze (18 cm height,

8.5 cm diameter). The vessel is ovoid with the body of a small mammal draped over

the top (see Fig. 10).31 The bronzes from Kayat Pyin are mostly sculptures and at least

one, an image of the Buddha (13 cm) seated in pralambanâsana is a local production.

The image is may have a high percentage of lead, or copper, with its style similar

Fig. 9: Thagara image of the Buddha (13

cm high), Hpaya Gyi Museum, Dawei

28 Moore and Aung Myint, 1991: 93.

29 Luce, 1969: I,20; Moore, 2007: 220, figure.

30 Moore, 2007: figures on 138, 220–221.

31 Than Swe, 1996.12

The Early Buddhist Archaeology of Myanmar

although somewhat cruder than 6th to 9th-century Dvaravati pieces.32 Another image

from Kayat Pyin shows links to 10th to 13th century images from Sri Lanka and in the

style of the throne, possibly Java (see Fig. 11).33

Another “Pyu” trait at Dawei are the stupa

and Makara votive tablets found at the walled

site of Mokti. Similar tablets have been recorded

at Sriksetra and in Rakhine.34 Two larger tablets

(12.5–14 x 10 cm) also from Mokti show a

central image of the Buddha seated on a double

lotus throne. The right hand is in Bhumisparsa

mudra with a small bowl held in the left hand.

Four bulbous stupas flank the image, two on

either side. The head is framed by a narrow arch

seen in a few tablets from Sriksetra.35 The stupa

tablets may have reached Dawei overland, for

similar tablets are found at Yarang in Pattani

province. At Yarang, they were linked to finds

of a number of stupikas with one tablet

inscribed in Sanskrit in Pallava script and dated

to the 7th century.36 Given the varied locations

where the tablets are documented, they may

have moved in both east and west directions

across the peninsula and from south to north

along the peninsula.

Fig. 10: Pot with mammal (18 cm

high), Than Swe (Dawei)

Collection

32 The same posture is seen in an image of the Buddha (13 cm) from Beikthano and another from Twante

(Luce, 1985: II, 76(b); Moore, 2007: 164)

33 The image (7.5 cm) is seated on a finely made throne (11 cm) in the Dhyani mudra, bears a flame or

sirispata Ushnisha, and has small flat hair curls. The throne has inward facing Makaras on the sides and

a Kirtimukha at the apex. The image of the Buddha is close to those of the Polonnaruva period (993–1235

AD), in the folding of the sanghati and the flame Ushnisha. Similar thrones with images are seen in

Rakhine, where they are attributed to the Late Polonnaruva (Gutman, 2001: 156–57; Listopad, 2003:

106–8).

34 Examples of the Makara-throne tablet from Mokti (8.7 x 6.9 cm) depict the Buddha seated on a double

elephant with Makaras flanking the throne. A rampant feline and a stupa flank the image on either side.

Similar Makara figures are seen flanking the Buddhas on a large gilded silver reliquary casket from

Sriksetra. For similar examples see Dupont, 1950: plate 497; Gutman, 2001: 57; Luce, 1985: plate 61a;

Mya, 1966: plates 19–15, 22, 60b.

35 The reverse of the paired stupa tablets is impressed with a leaf pattern, particularly deep on the central

stem. Again, there are parallel tablets from Sriksetra (Luce, 1985: II, 61(a); Mya, 1966: fig 60).

36 Pattaratorn has tentatively connected the tablet-stupika combination to the Caitayakanikaya, an

offshoot of the Mahayanist Mahasanghikasnikaya (Pattaratorn, 2000: 183).Elizabeth Moore 13

Conclusion: Ceremony, State and Place

Although future evidence may alter this hypothesis, the closest stylistic links to the

Tagaung roof tile end-pieces are in China and central Vietnam. As illustrated by

Tagaung’s small round votive tablets, these ties shift to South Asia with the advent of

Buddhist rule. Links to 6th to 9th century AD Dvaravati cultures of Central Thailand,

10th to 13th century AD Polonnaruva in Sri Lanka, and maritime polities in Sumatra

and Java, are highlighted by the Thagara local and imported images of the Buddha,

beads, urns, and pots described above.

Given the complexity and political

oscillation implied by these varied

styles, framing Tagaung and Thagara

within categories of Pyu or Mon alone

is at odds with the evidence. The

contrasts and commonalities are too

many for a simple separation.37

In privileging one ethno-linguistic

group such as Mon or Pyu in the

formation of state, the deep-rooted

changes needed to forge the first

Buddhist geography of the country

have been greatly neglected and

overshadowed. As we are at the outset

of documenting when and what

happened, the depth of conceptual

change in the spiritual beliefs of the

populace remains conjectural.

However, what is now clear is the

centrality of a specific location within

the cultural domain of a society.

This paper suggests that the role of

“place” and the implied land control

offers a new approach for

understanding the ancestral to

Buddhist transition.38 The relationship of Pyu and Mon is commonly interpreted

geographically, as most Pyu inscriptions are found in Upper Myanmar and Mon

inscriptions in Lower Myanmar. The Mon-Pyu dichotomy, however, confines ancient

37 There is clear recognition of otherness, although not necessarily ethnic as has been suggested for

various spirit legends of Upper Myanmar (Michio, 2000).

38 To re-iterate, “place” or abode is defined here as chthonic beliefs seen in prehistoric ancestral and later

Buddhist custody of a site.

Fig. 11: Sri Lanka Polonnaruva style image of

the Buddha (Aung Nwe Collection)14

The Early Buddhist Archaeology of Myanmar

territorial control within a modern, ethnic-bound concept of nation.39 The Pyu came to

be seen not only as the founders of the first city but the first nation. In Myanmar,

dynastic lines are not ones of family but of city and place, with separate ceremonies

for taking possession of the royal city and the palace.40 The importance of these did not

derive simply from their antiquity. Instead, like the site where successive Buddhas

attained Enlightenment (Bodhimanda), the place is of permanent significance as a

“victory ground.”41 As new Buddhist communities merged with or replaced prehistoric

kinship allegiances, the varied human demography, while providing one catalyst for

change, nonetheless remained immovably embedded in specific locations from

Tagaung to Thagara.

References

Aung Thaw 1968. Report on Excavations at Beikthano. Rangoon: Ministry of Union

Culture

Aung Thaw, Myint Aung, Sein Maung Oo, Than Swe. 1993. Ancient Myanmar Cities.

Yangon: Ministry of Information. (in Myanmar)

Aung Thwin. 2005. The Mists of Rāmañña: The Legend that was Lower Burma.

Honolulu: University of Hawai’i.

Aye Sandi. 1999. “Social Organisation of Dawei Nationals, Dawei Township,

Tanintharyi Division.” MA dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University

of Yangon, Yangon.

Blagden, C. O. 1919. “The Myazedi Inscriptions.” In: Taw Sein Ko and C. Duroiselle,

eds, Epigraphica Birmanica, Rangoon: Superintendent, Government Printing, pp.

59–68.

Brown, R. G. 1926. Burma As I Saw It 1889-1917. London: Methuen & Co.

Chit San Win. 2004. Myanmar Ancient Cities: Description of Tagaung Yangon: Pan

Myo-Taya Sabe. (in Myanmar)

Chit San Win. 2005. Pyu Pottery from Tagaung. Daw Maw Maw Pan Myo Tit-ya

39 On nation, see Taylor, 1987: 3. The process by which a few “Pyu” inscriptions have been interpreted as

representing the birth of a “Pyu nation” was long ago detected and warned against by Blagden: “The

evidence at present available seems to indicate that the nation which spoke the language of our text was a

forerunner of the Tibeto-Burman movement into the southern parts of the Irrawaddy valley…. The name

‘Pyu’ has merely been attached to it as a convenient label, not improbable in view of Burmese traditional

history, but by no means to be accepted as final” (Blagden 1919: 61; emphasis added).

40 Miksic (2007: 440) notes that in the Glass Palace Chronicle, kings were listed by capital rather than

dynasty, and that many were usurpers to the throne.

41 Myanmar Aungmeh, Pali Jayabhumi, see Tun Aung Chain, 2000: 124.Elizabeth Moore 15

Sabe. (in Myanmar)

Dupont, P. 1950. “Les Buddhas sur Naga dans l’art khmer.” Artibus Asiae, 13, 1-2, pp.

39–42.

George, E. C. S. 1981. Ruby Mines District, Burma Gazeteer. Vol.A. Reprint,

Rangoon: Superintendent, Government Printing and Stationary.

Gutman, P. 2001. Burma’s Lost Kingdoms: Splendors of Arakan. Connecticut/

Bangkok: Weatherhill/Orchid.

Hla Tun Pru. 2004. “City Wall Architecture and Conservation at Sriksetra.”

Unpublished paper for the International symposium on the preservation of cultural

heritage, Yangon, Myanmar Ministry of Culture and Australian Heritage.

Htin Aung, Maung. 1959. Burmese Folk-tales. 3rd ed., London: Oxford University

Press .

Htwe Htwe Win. 2007. “Votive Tablets of Myanmar.” PhD thesis, History Department,

University of Yangon.

Hudson, Bob. 2004. The Origins of Bagan. Sydney: University of Sydney.

Kyaw Minn Htin. 2007. “Historical Geography and Urbanization in Ancient Arakan,

Myanmar, The Archaeological Landscape of the Old Capitals to AD 1400.” Paper

presented at 2nd Singapore Graduate Forum on Southeast Asia Studies, Asia

Research Institute/ National University of Singapore 26-27 July 2007.

Kyaw Zin. 2007. “Glossary of Pyu Vocabulary.” Unpublished Manuscript.

Kyaw Zin. n.d.. “The Ancient History of Pyu-Bamar Before A-Naw-Ra-Htar.”

Unpublished manuscript, 99 pp.

Lal, B. B. 1954. “Excavations at Hastinapura.” Ancient India, Vol.10: 5-151. New

Delhi: Director General of Archaeology in India.

Listopad, J. 2003. “Polonnaruva Period.” In Guardian of the Flame: Art of Sri Lanka.

Phoenix: Phoenix Art Museum.

Luce, G. H. 1969–70. Old Burma-Early Pagan. 3 Vols. New York: J. J. Augustin.

Luce, G. H. 1985. Phases of Pre-Pagan Burma. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maung Tin and G. H. Luce. 1921. “Chronicle of the City of Tagaung.” Journal of the

Burma Research Society, 11, pp. 29–70.

Michio, T. 2000. “On Narrative Formation of Spirit Legends in Burma (Myanmar).”

In Hayashi Yukio and Yang Guangyuan, eds, Dynamics of Ethnic Cultures Across

National Boundaries in Southwestern China and Mainland Southeast Asia, Chiang

Mai: Ming Muang Printing, pp. 154–68.

Moore, Elizabeth. 2007. Early Landscapes of Myanmar. Bangkok: River Books.

Moore, Elizabeth. 2007 (in press). The Typology of Myanmar Archaeology: Tagaung

and ‘Pyu; Proceedings of the European Association of Southeast Asian

Archaeologists 11th International Conference, Bougon, France 25–30 September

2006 (ed. J. P. Pautreau et al).16

The Early Buddhist Archaeology of Myanmar

Moore, E. and Aung Myint. 1991. “Finger-marked Designs on Ancient Bricks in

Myanmar.” Journal of the Siam Society, 79, 2, pp. 81–102.

Moore, E. and Than Swe. 2006. “Early Walled Sites of Dawei: Thagara and Mokti.” In

L. Bacus, I. Glover, and V. Piggott, eds, Uncovering Southeast Asia’s Past,

selected papers from the Tenth Biennial Conference of the European Association of

Southeast Asian Archaeologists, The British Museum, London, September 2004,

Singapore, National University Press, pp. 271–82.

Mya (Thiripyanchi). 1961. Votive Tablets of Burma, Part 2. Rangoon, Department of

Archaeology.

Myint Aung 2003. “Halin Pottery.” In: Ceramic Traditions in Myanmar. SEAMEO.

Yangon, SEAMEO Regional Centre for History and Tradition, pp. 90–115.

Myint Aung. 1970. “The Excavations at Halin.” Journal of the Burma Research

Society 53, 2, pp. 55–64.

Pandita Nanda (Tagaung), Win Maung (Tampawaddy) and Chit San Win. 2006. “The

Pyu city of Tagaung.” Unpublished manuscript. (in Myanmar)

Pattaratorn Chirapravati, M.L. 2000. “Development of Buddhist Traditions in

Peninsular Thailand: A Study based on votive tablets (Seventh to Eleventh

Centuries).” In N. Taylor, ed., Studies in Southeast Asian Art, Essays in Honor of

Stanley J. O’Connor , Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, pp. 172–93.

Pe Maung Tin and G. H. Luce. 1960 [1923]. The Glass Palace Chronicle of the Kings

of Burma. Rangoon: Burma Research Society.

San Win. 1997. “Report on Fieldwork at Tagaung 26 January to 5 February, 16–26

May 1997.” Yangon: Universities’ Historical Research Centre.

Southworth, W. A. 2004. “The Coastal States of Champa.” In I. Glover and P.

Bellwood, eds., Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to History, London: Routledge

Curzon, pp. 209–33.

Stargardt, J. 1990. The Ancient Pyu of Burma. Cambrige: PACSEA in association with

the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies Singapore.

Stargardt, J. 1994 “Urbanization before Indianization at Beikthano, Central Burma, C.

1st Century BC–3rd Century AD?” In: Proceedings of the 5th International

Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists, Paris,

University of Hull.

Taylor, Robert. 1987. The State in Burma. London: C. Hurst & Co.

Tha Myat, Thiripyanchi. 1963. Pyu-phat-sar (Pyu Reader). Rangoon: U Hla Din.

Tha Myat, Thiripyanchi. 1972. Myanmar-ek-kha-ya-hnit-ga-nan-thin-khya-hu’-pat

(Myanmar vowels and numbers). Rangoon: Sarpay Beikman.

Than Swe 1996. Nine Pagodas of Dawei. Yangon: Ah-they Ah-waing Sabeh. (in

Myanmar)

Tun Aung Chain. 2005. “Prophecy and Planets: Forms of Legitimation of the RoyalElizabeth Moore 17

City in Myanmar.” Selected Writing of Tun Aung Chain. Myanmar Historical

Commission. Yangon, Ministry of Education, pp. 124–51.

Yang Xiaoneng. 2004. New Perspectives on China’s Past. Chinese Archaeology in the

Twentieth Century, Vol.2: Major Archaeological Discoveries in Twentieth Century

China. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Zhang, Zengqi. 1993. “The Bronze Culture of Dian.” In Y. Jing, ed., Collection of

Chinese Bronze Works, Dian Section, Committee of Chinese Bronze Works

Leave a comment